All stories

Technology

Daniel Kim

Director of Digital StrategyAssociation of Independent Engineering Professionals

Daniel rebuilt his association’s digital experience around a single measurement almost nobody tracks: how long it takes a member to find the one thing they came for.

Denver, Colorado

Daniel Kim smiling, photographed against a textured concrete wall.
Daniel’s team working through the site redesign around a shared table of laptops.

Why we love this

Why We Love What Daniel Is Doing

Most association website redesigns begin with a navigation debate. Daniel Kim started his with a stopwatch.

He sat beside eleven members, gave each of them a real task drawn from their own inbox, and timed how long it took to find the answer on the association’s website. The median was four minutes and twenty seconds. Three members never found it at all. One found a document, read it for a while, and then realized it had been superseded in 2019.

Two years later, the same task set takes a median of thirty-eight seconds. Getting there had far less to do with technology than the job title on Daniel’s door suggests.

The Challenge

The association had accumulated the thing every membership organization accumulates: eighteen years of good work, published continuously, organized by the department that produced it.

There were seven separate places a member might reasonably look for guidance on seismic retrofit standards. Four of them had something. Two of those were current. Nothing on any page indicated which was which.

We did not have a content problem. We had a "which of these four documents should I trust" problem, and we were making every member solve it alone.

Daniel Kim

The instinct in the building was to rebuild the site. Daniel argued for something less satisfying and more useful: fix what members actually search for first, and only then talk about design.

What They Changed

He started by reading twelve months of internal site search queries — every word members had typed into the search box and, crucially, everything they typed immediately afterwards when the first search failed.

The second query is where the real intent lives. Someone searches "PE renewal," gets nothing useful, and then searches "continuing education hours Colorado." Those two queries are the same person, thirty seconds apart, getting more specific because the system failed them.

A wall of sticky notes grouping member search queries into themes.
Twelve months of failed searches, grouped on a wall until the patterns held still.

Four changes, in the order they shipped

  • Every resource got a review date and an owner. Anything unowned and older than three years was archived or refreshed — 640 items were retired in the first pass.
  • Search was rebuilt to understand how engineers actually talk, mapping member vocabulary to internal taxonomy so "PE renewal" and "continuing education" reach the same shelf.
  • A short, optional interest profile was added — three questions, asked once — covering discipline, licensure state and career stage.
  • The member dashboard was replaced with a single "what you probably need next" panel driven by that profile plus what the member has actually opened.

Daniel is careful about the word personalization. "We are not guessing what you want. We are remembering what you told us and what you already did," he says. "Members forgive a wrong guess. They do not forgive feeling watched."

Listening to Members

The interest profile could have been a twelve-question form. Daniel’s team tested that version first and watched the completion rate collapse after question five.

They cut it to three questions and moved it to the moment a member first hits a paywall or a resource library, when the reason to answer is obvious. Completion went from 22% to 78%.

Median time to find a resource, from 4m20s
38s
Interest profile completion, from 22%
78%
Outdated resources retired
640
Resource downloads per active member
2.7×
The association’s open office, with staff working across shared desks.

What Happened Next

The most-cited outcome inside the association is not the search improvement. It is that the education team now knows, weekly, what members are looking for and failing to find. The failed-search report goes out every Monday morning to program staff.

Three of last year’s best-attended webinars came directly from that report — topics nobody had proposed, that hundreds of members had already asked for in a search box.

Our members were telling us what to build every single week. We just had not been reading it.

Daniel Kim

What Other Associations Can Learn

  • Your internal site search log is the cheapest member research you will ever run, and most associations have never read one.
  • Pay attention to the second search, not the first. That is where members tell you what they actually meant.
  • Ask for member information at the moment it obviously helps them, not at the moment it is convenient for you to collect it.
  • Retiring content is member service. Four documents on the same topic is not generosity, it is a decision you have handed to the member.

Technology matters when it helps a member get where they need to go faster.

Daniel KimDirector of Digital Strategy, Association of Independent Engineering Professionals

The Member Impact

What changed for members

Members reach what they need in seconds rather than minutes, and the association now has a weekly, unfiltered signal of what its members are trying to do.

Median time to find a resource
4m20s → 38s
Resource downloads per active member
2.7×
Members with an interest profile
78%

Beyond the numbers

  • Every resource has a named owner and a review date.
  • Failed member searches are reported to program staff every Monday.
  • Three of the year’s top webinars originated from search data rather than committee proposals.
  • Recommendations always display the reason they were shown.

I used to keep a bookmark folder because I could never find anything twice. I deleted it last spring.

Structural engineer and member since 2014 — on Daniel’s work

In their words

Hear It From Daniel

Daniel working with a colleague at a laptop in the association office.
Video interview coming soon

Daniel Kim on reading twelve months of failed searches

5 min

Daniel explains why the second thing a member types into your search box matters more than the first, and how a three-question profile outperformed a twelve-question one.

Add a YouTube or Vimeo embed URL to this profile’s video.url field to replace this placeholder.

See every story
Maya Thompson smiling, photographed against a bright window.
Membership

Maya Thompson

Vice President of Member ExperienceNational Association of Community Health Professionals

Maya rebuilt her association’s first ninety days after she personally interviewed dozens of new members — and discovered almost…

Sophia Martinez photographed in profile against a dark studio backdrop.
Education

Sophia Martinez

Director of EducationNational Society for Behavioral Health Leaders

Sophia scrapped a flagship certificate program that everyone was proud of and almost nobody finished — then rebuilt learning…

Marcus Bennett standing outdoors with his arms folded, wearing a blue jacket.
Membership

Marcus Bennett

Director of MembershipAmerican Outdoor Industry Professionals Association

Marcus put eight members and four staff in the same room every month, wrote down everything, and built the discipline that…

Nominate someone

Know Someone Who Loves Their Members?

The association community is full of people doing thoughtful, creative, and meaningful work for their members.

Help us find them.

Nominate Someone

It takes about five minutes. You can nominate a colleague, a peer at another organization, or your whole team.